The Town Hall Archives

Felicity Carden · Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2003 8:13 pm Post subject:

The main thing, he'll get his main judgement from God! No one can compare to the almight power that is the Heavenly Father. ^_^ *gets hugged by Jesus and God*

rosie · Inquisitive Member Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 1197

You (and me and everyone else) deserves to burn in hell just as much as he does. I want him to become a Christian. I want him to stop hurting people, so yeah, I hope he dies.

Jared · Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:26 pm Post subject:

Under God's infinite holiness, we are all equally sinful and deserving of the lake of fire. But God gave power to governments and it is their responsibility to confront evil and to take action against those who would injure the people of the nation the government represents.

Respectahobbit · Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2003 4:35 am Post subject:

Yeah. And if Saddam keeps going on like this, he should know he will go to hell. Shock

smurfs · Guest

How said he wasent already Very Happy

Respectahobbit · Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2003 11:09 pm Post subject:

I WANT TO DESTROY THAT SADAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Mad

:xAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!HOW DARE HE!!!!!!!! No, he's NOT A HE! He's a MONSTER! He's the AGENT OF SATAN!!!!! Evil or Very Mad

Felicity Carden · Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:30 pm Post subject:

Vengence is mine, sayeth the Lord. ^_^

Now, don't give Saddam milk if your giving him arsenic cookies! Milk will neutrulize the poison and he'll be still alive! O_o;

Just let him eat the gosh darn cookies!!!

Coralfish · Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 3:47 pm Post subject:

hawkeye · Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 6:22 pm Post subject:

Ok, yeah, your very correct. Oddly enough I thought of that yesterday. I was thinking I should make a sign for my vehicle that states I support Iraqi liberation, our troops, and president Bush. I am sure if I do, my vehicle will be vandalized, but Im not going to let that stop me.

extraneous interference · Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 8:09 pm Post subject: Saddam

I believe in the just war theory; that war must be the last resort, that it must target only combatants, must not be an imperial, expansionist war, etc.

Over the last 12 years, Sadam has not been allowed to produce weapons of mass destruction. However, he booted out UN inspectors and has had years to create these weapons. So now that every informed person believes he has them, we have to decide whether or not to go to war.

If this war was all about disarmament, then I would completely support it. Iraq is in the most volatile area of the world; being within 150 km of Israel creates a certain urgency to the disarming of Sadam. (if Sadam were to launch some weapons of mass destruction at Israel, I don't think Israel would respond with any restraint, and Israel has nukes...) UN inspections were never expected to be successful and the world is left with the option of appeasement or war.

We know from history that appeasement doesn't work. Britain and France tried to appease Hitler in 1935, even after his military aggression towards Austria and other countries with a German population. Eventually the world was pulled into war. Would it not have made more sense to attack Germany before Hitler had manufactured the most powerful army on earth? I believe we have a similar situation in Iraq today, we have seen years of appeasement and proclaimed ignorance of Sadam's activities.

Now Bush is at war. The BIG problem with war is that Bush wants a regime change. It makes sense; disarm sadam and he'll rearm. But what do you replace it with? a democracy? Bush, and most americans with him, wants to replace it with a western style democracy. I think this is rather short-sighted. Imagine, if the Iraqi people were to elect an anti-american government, is Bush going to stand back and say: "The people of Iraq have spoken, good for them!" I doubt it.

Perhaps a constitutional monarchy like Jordan's would be appropriate. The Iraqis are used to a dictatorship-style government, and a democracy doesn't fit into their political culture. They are not used to any sort of political participation, all they want is freedom to live and prosper. A benevolent King may be the best option.

But in the United States, will Bush be re-elected if he replaces one dictator with another? I doubt the american populate will be so long-sighted to see that would be the right thing....