The Town Hall Forum Index The Town Hall Archives
Ahh, the nostalgia.
 
  SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   Log inLog in 

A Problem
 
   The Town Hall Forum Index -> Impolite Company Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jeremy
The Great Debater


Joined: 03 Jan 2003
Posts: 448
Location: Arizona, USA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 3:15 pm    Post subject:

Tianlet wrote:
There are many things that the Bible does not "remotely address" that are still wrong.


If there is no principle in the Word of God that applies to something, then it should be left to individual conscience and the Spirit's guidance. In other words, if something is not clearly wrong (or clearly required) according to the Word of God, then there should not be any teachings or requirements about it.

Is the Word of God the sole authority for doctrine? If not, it should be.

If you can't show something from the Bible, then it should not be taught by a church. Shouldn't we all be able to agree on that?

Jeremy
Jonathan
Dungeon Master


Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 2254
Location: Minnesota and/or North Dakota

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:18 pm    Post subject:

Jeremy wrote:
Tianlet wrote:
There are many things that the Bible does not "remotely address" that are still wrong.


If there is no principle in the Word of God that applies to something, then it should be left to individual conscience and the Spirit's guidance. In other words, if something is not clearly wrong (or clearly required) according to the Word of God, then there should not be any teachings or requirements about it.

Is the Word of God the sole authority for doctrine? If not, it should be.

If you can't show something from the Bible, then it should not be taught by a church. Shouldn't we all be able to agree on that?

Jeremy


I'm not going to get into this (I hope), but I agree with Jeremy.

-Jonathan
Tianlet
New Citizen


Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 50
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 6:16 pm    Post subject:

I think before I dig myself a pit I can't get out of that Jeremy should define "remotely address." Smoking, for instance, was something I said, but maybe he is thinking of the same passage I was about the body being the temple of the Holy Spirit.

I need to know what you're thinking to argue w/ it.
Amadeo
Senior Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2003
Posts: 1207

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 6:33 pm    Post subject:

Jeremy wrote:
Tianlet wrote:
There are many things that the Bible does not "remotely address" that are still wrong.


If there is no principle in the Word of God that applies to something, then it should be left to individual conscience and the Spirit's guidance. In other words, if something is not clearly wrong (or clearly required) according to the Word of God, then there should not be any teachings or requirements about it.

I completely disagree. First of all, people have differing interpretations so what may be "clearly" in the Bible for one person may not be for another. Also, it is just wrong to let people do destructive things because the Bible does not mention it in plain words. Do you see drugs in the Bible? No. Does that allow for people to pursue this activity until their conscience convicts them? I think not. :|

What you are always concerned about is "salvation" issues. When a church tells women not to wear blue jeans to church or tells their people not to smoke they probably are not saying that their members will go to hell if they do. (There may be exceptions but I am not addressing those right now). Too often churches that dare to hold standards are labeled "cult-like" because people are offended. I am NOT saying this is what Arem and Rachael experienced, I am addressing what others are saying in this thread. America is a free country and people can easily change churches. If they do not like the standards held by one church they can move on to another. But they are doing the Body of Christ a disservice by labeling their former church "cult-like." Often people who choose to join churches holding the higher standards do not mind them. Others may view them as "repressed" but they may not see themselves that way. Considering the widespread beliefs about Christianity in existence, we must either conclude that God is going to let some people in Heaven even if their beliefs are not perfect or only a few people from one denomination have it right and will be saved. I believe it is the former. Those who want the higher standards are not going to hell for it and their lives might even be better as a result (not smoking, drinking, etc.).
Jeremy
The Great Debater


Joined: 03 Jan 2003
Posts: 448
Location: Arizona, USA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 7:51 pm    Post subject:

Tianlet wrote:
I think before I dig myself a pit I can't get out of that Jeremy should define "remotely address." Smoking, for instance, was something I said, but maybe he is thinking of the same passage I was about the body being the temple of the Holy Spirit.


The Bible does say that we shouldn't have addictions or let anything control us or enslave us. (1 Corinthians 6:12 for example.)

Amadeo wrote:
Also, it is just wrong to let people do destructive things because the Bible does not mention it in plain words. Do you see drugs in the Bible? No. Does that allow for people to pursue this activity until their conscience convicts them? I think not. Neutral


I didn't say it had to say it in plain words, I just said you should be able to show it from the Bible, if you're going to be teaching it. In fact, I said I was talking about things which the Bible does not even "remotely address." Answer me this: do you agree that the Bible should be the sole authority for all doctrine/teaching? If you would say yes, then I don't see how you can disagree with my earlier statement. :?

Regarding drug abuse, see 1 Corinthians 6:12:

"All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any."

Amadeo wrote:
Considering the widespread beliefs about Christianity in existence, we must either conclude that God is going to let some people in Heaven even if their beliefs are not perfect or only a few people from one denomination have it right and will be saved. I believe it is the former.


Of course it is the former. Did anyone imply something different?

Jeremy
howdypardner
Junior Member


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 217
Location: Oklahoma

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:00 pm    Post subject:

The KJV, while it is a beautiful translation, is rapidly becoming out-of-date for the average person. English as it is spoken today is far different from the language in 1611. I can't tell you how many times I've had to explain Bible verses to kids at church - they honestly don't know what "thee" or "hearken" means. Also, many times I've been working with kids who barely spoke today's English, let alone the King's English. Why should we force someone to learn a new language to understand the Bible? Yes, the Word of God is living and active - but we don't need to be putting obstacles in the way of children understanding it.

Another issue I have with the KJV today is that it gives the impression that all the characters in the Bible spoke Old English. These were real flesh-and-blood people with favorite colors and pet peeves; when they're saying "Verily, behold" and so on, it takes away from their humanity (especially Jesus' disciples).
Arem852003
Knows the Delta Quadrant inside out.


Joined: 08 Feb 2003
Posts: 477
Location: Traveling through the DQ tring to make my way bach to Earth.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:25 pm    Post subject:

the only reason i said my church was like a cult is because they believe only the people of that church and denomanation will go to heaven. because my mom and i decided to go to a different church and denomanation they think we will die and go to hell, which is not the case. im as saved as i was the first day i asked Christ to save me.

Tianlet wrote:
Quote:
I'm guessing that if you (as a girl, if you are one) wore blue jeans to church one Sunday morning, people might take second looks, but did anyone come up to you and forbid you to wear them? Probably not. The Bible says "Judge not that ye be not judged," but usually people take that the wrong way.

the fact of the matter is, it didnt matter if i wore them to Church or not, i got repremanded for it and was told i shoulndt wear them and that i knew better. i was told i was in the wrong and was not saved b/c i listened to a group called Casting Crowns, witch im sure most of you have heard them. i was told i was wicked and that i should have been farther along in my salvation than that.
i was told i was not allowed to be around the other teenagers in my church b/c they thought i was a bad inflounce b/c i cut and died my hair, and b/c when i turned 18 i made soem mistakes. i thought Jesus forgave me of them mistakes and loved me in spite of them. was i wrong in believing that?
i dont believe i am "blowing this out of proportion." like you say you think i am.
Ami
Somewhat Aging Member


Joined: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 395
Location: Ar.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:11 pm    Post subject:

Hey Smile I've not gotten into this disscussion because I still support the authorized version, and I didn't and still don't want to get into a debate about it. There are reasons I believe it, and no, I've not been brainwashed.
I also haven't read this entire thread. I just wanted to comment on what you said, Arem. I wanted to say an emphatic NO in that you are not wrong in believe that Jesus forgives all mistakes, or sins, as long as we confess them. If we confess our sin, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sin and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. It clearly states this (or closely states this) in the Bible. Always remember, whatever the Bible says we can take it as truth because..
In the beginning was the word, and the word was God and the Word was with God, the same was in the beginning with God, all things were made by him, and without him, was not anything made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men, and the light shineth in the darkness and the darkness comprehended it not. (I'm not sure if this is verbatim... I'm at school, and my Bible is in my locker)
I said all that to say this. The Bible is truth. God inspired many different men to write it, yes, but the words are God's word, God cannot lie, He cannot sin. He is God. Whatever he says is. If it wasn't, we wouldn't be here today Smile
Anyways, Arem, I hope that helps. God always forgives and forgets if we will but ask him.
Have a good day, and God Bless
Jeremy
The Great Debater


Joined: 03 Jan 2003
Posts: 448
Location: Arizona, USA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 5:03 pm    Post subject:

Arem,

No, you are not blowing things out of proportion at all. I would definitely call a church like that cult-like, as well. There is simply no excuse for that type of behavior/attitude/teaching from a church which calls itself Christian. The term for it is "spiritual abuse."

And yes, since you are saved, all of your sins have been forgiven. Period. "Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus." (Romans 8:1)

Jeremy
Arwen
Really Likes Personalized Ranks


Joined: 12 Jul 2003
Posts: 1193
Location: The Middle of Nowhere

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:14 pm    Post subject:

I agree that the church seems very legalistic. Though you should try not to sin, God does forgive you when you do, and he lets you start anew.

And they're DEAD wrong about Casting Crowns. They are as real (and friendly) as they can be (I just saw them 2 weeks ago).
I wonder what the church would think if they visited a church where Mark Hall is a youth PASTOR. Rolling Eyes Wink
Display posts from previous:   
   The Town Hall Forum Index -> Impolite Company All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group