| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Was Herbert Hoover responsible for the Great Depression? |
| Yes |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| No |
|
58% |
[ 7 ] |
| Yes And No |
|
41% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Disco Dan Scholarly Artist

Joined: 27 Dec 2003 Posts: 3723 Location: In the land of Deep but not Profound...
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:36 am Post subject: Was Herbert Hoover responsible for the Great Depression? |
|
Many have accused Hoover of the Great Depression being his fault. What are your opinions on this?
Last edited by Disco Dan on Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
 |
Jonathan Dungeon Master

Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 2254 Location: Minnesota and/or North Dakota
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
Yes and no. One the one hand, the economy goes in cycles. He just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The actual crash was more others faults.
However, after the crash he made some real dumb moves, like gassing the bonus army in DC and introducing horrible programs to try to fix it (which is why I think he lost the election).
-Jonathan |
|
 |
Disco Dan Scholarly Artist

Joined: 27 Dec 2003 Posts: 3723 Location: In the land of Deep but not Profound...
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
| I've heard Hoover is recognized as doing a good Job to attempt to fix the Depression. |
|
 |
Jonathan Dungeon Master

Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 2254 Location: Minnesota and/or North Dakota
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
The key word there is 'attempt'. While he doesn't get enough credit for his efforts, the fact is they didn't work.
-Jonathan |
|
 |
Disco Dan Scholarly Artist

Joined: 27 Dec 2003 Posts: 3723 Location: In the land of Deep but not Profound...
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
| So, you would say he was not the "cause", but he wasn't the solution either, eh? |
|
 |
Samwise Actually Using the Submit Button Member

Joined: 04 Jan 2003 Posts: 1011 Location: Where people love eating fish!!!!! Status:Admiral
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
| I agree with Jonathan, Hoover didn't initiate the Great Depression but he also did nothing to fix it, so to speak. |
|
 |
Jonathan Dungeon Master

Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 2254 Location: Minnesota and/or North Dakota
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
| Eugene Blackgaard wrote: | | So, you would say he was not the "cause", but he wasn't the solution either, eh? |
Yeah, something like that.
-Jonathan |
|
 |
JM91 Seasoned Veteran Member

Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 780 Location: In my convenient Lexus Cage
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
| Eugene Blackgaard wrote: | | So, you would say he was not the "cause", but he wasn't the solution either, eh? |
yeah that's what I think |
|
 |
Jared Cute and Cuddly

Joined: 23 Nov 2002 Posts: 4672 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
I have a class, and potentially a quiz, in 15 minutes, so I'll keep this brief, but in any economy predicated on the use of fiat money, the business cycle is in full effect. You will have boom, turning point, bust and recovery, with the end of the recovery stage being the only true and desirable form of the market economy. Inflation, deflation and the changing valuations that lead to this cycle can only be ended by eliminating all forms of a national bank and considering only precious metal or other tangible good specie an acceptable form of exchange.
I would differ from the Austrian school economists who make the above argument to suggest that we should return to the gold and silver standard, as this is higly impractical. However, we must recognize that with the reliance on fiat money, we incur the full effect of the business cycle. The economic policies of Harding, Coolidge and Hoover were better than average. Unfortunately for Hoover, his term simply coincided with the end of the extended boom cycle of the previous years, which had to be expected, as the presidents of the turn of the century presided over times of grave overinflation.
The bust could have been short and shallow, but the interventionist policies initiated by Roosevelt to "end" the depression failed, as such attempts to hinder the market cycle always must, and deepened and lengthened it drastically. |
|
 |
Jonathan Dungeon Master

Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 2254 Location: Minnesota and/or North Dakota
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
| Jared wrote: | | The bust could have been short and shallow, but the interventionist policies initiated by Roosevelt to "end" the depression failed, as such attempts to hinder the market cycle always must, and deepened and lengthened it drastically. |
What interventionist policies of Roosevelt failed?
-Jonathan |
|
 |
|