 |
The Town Hall Archives Ahh, the nostalgia.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Would you vote for me after reading my speech? |
| Yes |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| Yes |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| No way! You're evil enough to marry Regis, what's stopping you from taking over Odyssey? |
|
45% |
[ 10 ] |
| No way! You're evil enough to marry Regis, what's stopping you from taking over Odyssey? |
|
45% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 22 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jared Cute and Cuddly

Joined: 23 Nov 2002 Posts: 4672 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
Okay, some clarifications.
Police and fire are government, I agree, but people in those branches don't refer to their work as "government work." They are employed by the state, but when a person says they work in "government," this is rarely what they mean. And they don't even ever use the term "that is all" in police/fire/etc unless they are a dispatcher.
On the antibiotics prescription thing, you definitely know a lot about the issue involved, but I believe you missed the key point of the previous discussion: KNOWINGLY. Sometimes doctors are lazy, yes, and that's a problem -- deserving of you either demanding more or looking for another doctor. But in a case like that, it's hardly criminal negligence and it is definitely not knowingly prescribing the wrong medication.
On the last issue, I must apologize for very, very poor wording. I said something completely different than what I meant and now I feel rather dumb about the whole thing. Perfectly safe is definitely not the correct way to describe medical treatments that can, as you say, often have many side effects and cause many problems. However, my goal in that argument, before making that poorly-thought-out comment, is that the drugs are rigorously tested by the FDA, not the doctor. Patients are subjected to SOME risk, of course. The field of medicine is not perfect. But they are not used as "gineau pigs" by doctors wanting to try out a new potential cure, or at least not without previous FDA tests and their full understanding and agreement to take it despite risks.
Have their been physicians who have prescribed drugs that are still test-stage without their patient's approval? I'm sure that there have. But that's a criminal offense with or without a "patient's bill of rights." |
|
 |
Jeremy The Great Debater
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Posts: 448 Location: Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
| Jared Walczak wrote: | | On the antibiotics prescription thing, you definitely know a lot about the issue involved, but I believe you missed the key point of the previous discussion: KNOWINGLY. Sometimes doctors are lazy, yes, and that's a problem -- deserving of you either demanding more or looking for another doctor. But in a case like that, it's hardly criminal negligence and it is definitely not knowingly prescribing the wrong medication. |
For the issue I was talking about, it's not just sometimes.
About the "knowingly" thing:
Sometimes a doctor will even tell you that it is most likely a viral infection, and yet they still prescribe an antibiotic for you, to make it look like they are helping you (when they are actually harming you, as I stated before). And I believe that they do basically know sometimes that it is a viral infection, but I won't get into that. Let's say they don't know. Well, they do know that a lot of the cases of people going to the doctor saying they're sick are viral cases. Yet they prescribe an antibiotic for all of those people with viral infections. They don't test to see whether it is a viral or bacterial infection, as I stated before. Sometimes a doctor will test for strep, but they give you an antibiotic (yes, amoxicillin! ) and wait for the test result to come back, and if you don't have strep, too bad, your good bacteria are destroyed! Or if it's an instant strep test, what do they do if the test comes back negative? Give you an antibiotic anyway (you guessed it, amoxicillin! ). Talk about the useless and rip off nature of strep tests, since they give you the same treatment no matter if you have strep or not.
The problem is that they don't realize the importance of good bacteria. They don't realize that good bacteria are, would you guess, good for you, and are needed for good health. They also don't realize the danger of the over-use of antibiotics. So of course they'll just give them to everyone. And this is standard procedure.
| Jared Walczak wrote: | | On the last issue, I must apologize for very, very poor wording. I said something completely different than what I meant and now I feel rather dumb about the whole thing. Perfectly safe is definitely not the correct way to describe medical treatments that can, as you say, often have many side effects and cause many problems. However, my goal in that argument, before making that poorly-thought-out comment, is that the drugs are rigorously tested by the FDA, not the doctor. Patients are subjected to SOME risk, of course. The field of medicine is not perfect. But they are not used as "gineau pigs" by doctors wanting to try out a new potential cure, or at least not without previous FDA tests and their full understanding and agreement to take it despite risks. |
Well, just know that the FDA doesn't care about your health much more than Saddam Hussein does.
And with that note to close on, I'll finish my rant.
Jeremy
P.S. I may have been generalizing a little bit about amoxicillin, but the points remain the same. |
|
 |
Dave Cursor Always on Submit Button Member
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 943 Location: Here
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
I think people are composing too much long post on this thread, JARED AND JEREMY!
This started out as a nice mayoral speach, finished out talking about medication. Boy, the things we can accomplish be writing long posts!
Does anyone, apart from Jared and Jeremy, read those long posts? I know I sure don't! |
|
 |
Coralfish Town Hall Judge

Joined: 17 Dec 2002 Posts: 1790 Location: Southern Academia
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
Yes, actually I do read most of the long debates. However, by the time I am finished, there is no time to reply!  |
|
 |
hawkeye Linux Geek

Joined: 23 Nov 2002 Posts: 2408 Location: Inventors Corner
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
I read most of them.
A few notes...
The FDA is a government organization intended to protect people from obvious hazards, but as government goes, it doesnt always do what it should. Aspartane is one such issue. The story goes that the company that makes aspartane is a huge funder of the FDA. I do think there is a fair bit of truth to the alleged dangers of aspartane.
Doctors do, too often prescribe antibiotics for viral diseases, but the main reason is because so many patients insist the doctor do so, and if the doctor does not prescribe something, the patient feels like the doctor did nothing. However, doctors are starting to cut back on this habit as this has attributed to the superbugs (anti biotic resistant bacteria).
As for experimental drugs, patients basicly have to sign their lives away to get within 5 feet of the stuff, as the doctors and the hospitals and the drug maker dont want any liability if the drug should cause some undeterminable side affect or other adverse reaction. Families now days look for anyway to make a quick buck, especially when a family member dies or has some other issue. |
|
 |
Dave Cursor Always on Submit Button Member
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 943 Location: Here
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
Well you don't have to get involved!
Coralfish Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 10:07 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, actually I do read most of the long debates. However, by the time I am finished, there is no time to reply!
That is what I know would happen with me. I figure it's just a huge waste of time to write 'em and read 'em. It's nice that most people on this board are good at "keeping it short." |
|
 |
Rachael Blackgaard Thinks She Can Outsmart the Admins

Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 798 Location: XY coordinates Classified
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
I tend to get in trouble for posting short...
In ODYSSEY, I'm married to Regis. Actually, it was his twin brother that was going out with the mayor, but now Edwin is married to Felicity and will be a father in about two and a half months : - ) I was going to run for mayor to try to hold Odyssey hostage until Carl Lordwell and Michael Morbridle handed over the stolen computer files, to save me a trip to Egypt, but now it looks like I don't have a choice... : - (
I thought it was a nice speech too, but maybe better suited to a president. Some people really take pretend politics too far. |
|
 |
Respectahobbit Short Creature with Furry Feet

Joined: 04 Jan 2003 Posts: 1321 Location: Robin: Home: Bag End
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
I don't think you should have made the no option so harsh..
Hehe are you planning to really take over the world? Lol that'll be funny. |
|
 |
Rachael Blackgaard Thinks She Can Outsmart the Admins

Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 798 Location: XY coordinates Classified
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
| Believe it or not, I'm not as interested in World Domination as Regis is. I just want to recover some stolen computer files for the NSA, which will help me find out which virus Miriam has. |
|
 |
Dave Cursor Always on Submit Button Member
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 943 Location: Here
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
Really? tell us more about this mission.
Yes, some people take this too seriosuly. Including you! |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|